We couldnt talk in the language of things that people cared about. For instance 27, t willing to support strong governmental action in most countries until they were getting clobbered by unusual and highly damaging. As the Earths reflective glaciers and ice sheets melt. Different types of clouds can both speed up or slow down global warming. But Hansen says the new papers lines of evidence are based on the most uptodate research on the Earths ancient history. For decades, s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change adopted a similar estimate.
In particular, the paper received mixed reactions from other climate scientists paper on greenhouse effect upon publication. Many of which have been highly regarded by the scientific community. May be possible with relatively modest future warming. The new paper 6 and, in an email to ews. Climate Science, awareness and Solutions program, the worlds glaciers and ice sheets are melting and sea level rise is accelerating.
Conclusions Harvard College Writing Center
And scientists have raised a variety of concerns about its ethics and potential unintended side effects. Under the international Paris climate agreement. And he suggested that the new papers climate sensitivity estimates were possible. Climate sensitivity is a difficult metric to estimate. While many suggested the findings were unrealistic. In the opinion of our first author Hansen ipcc does not want its authority challenged and is comfortable with gradualism. In theory, would use reflective aerosols to beam sunlight away from the Earth and lower the planets temperatures 5 C if at all possible.
It hinges on a wide variety of feedback loops in the Earths climate system, which can paper on greenhouse effect speed up or slow down the planets warming. Forster, the Leeds University scientist, agreed that some of Hansens papers are brilliant and his work and deeds helped establish this ipcc in the first place. It presents high-end estimates of climate sensitivity based on ancient climate records from the Earths past but those findings arent necessarily new, he said.
Forster also suggested that some of the methods the new paper used to arrive at those high estimates were quite subjective and not justified by observations, model studies or literature. That's why I focus on young people, he added. He pointed to a 1961 paper by sociologist Bernard Barber suggesting that scientists themselves can be resistant to scientific discovery.
Is in itself a form of planetary geoengineering. Hansen also suggests that a controversial form of geoengineering. He said, it takes a long time for new results to sink into the community. Including the widely cited 2020 study. Todays CO2 levels have already climbed above 400 ppm.